Home
The Whiskey Taster’s Flavor Guide

Still Austin Cask Strength Monster Mash Bourbon Review

Tasting Notes & Ratings

Expert Rating: TBD

Still Austin Cask Strength Monster Mash Bourbon Photo

Distillery Tasting Notes

Made by Still Austin Whiskey Co.

On the nose with hints of maple syrup, caramel candies, and coconut-almond candy bars. On the palate, look for impressions of pecan candied apples, Mexican hot chocolate, and toffee bars, followed by lingering notes of cream soda and banana pudding.

Review This Whiskey

Details

Proof: 53.55
Alcohol by volume (ABV): 107.1%
Aged: 26 month
Mash Bill: 70% Corn, 25% Rye, and 5% Malted Barley
Retail (MSRP): Provide this info

What whiskeys do YOU think have a similar taste profile as Still Austin Cask Strength Monster Mash Bourbon? (Login to answer)

Click this button to find Bourbons or other whiskeys that might be similar in taste profile. Results below. Don't forget our Bourbon search engine where you can search by flavor profile.

Reviews by the People of Still Austin Cask Strength Monster Mash Bourbon

The People have not posted a review for this whiskey. Be the first!
Review This Whiskey

Ratings Key

Ratings breakdown based on a 100 point scale.

  • 90-100 Exceptional
  • 80-89 Very Good
  • 70-79 Average
  • 60-69 Below Average
  • 50-60 Drain Pour
The Whiskey Taster’s Flavor Guide
How to Evaluate Bourbon and Other Whiskeys

Bourbon tastings have become a popular activity among whiskey drinkers. In fact, you have seen enthusiasts analyze and evaluate whiskeys as if they are examining a fine work of art. These experts refe...Read More

Stagg Jr. Batches, Release Dates, and Proofs

Buffalo Trace Distillery's Stagg (formerly Stagg Jr.) is one of the market's most popular and often allocated bourbons. This bold, uncut, and unfiltered whiskey is made from Buffalo Trace'...Read More

A Review of Old Forester 1897 Bottled in Bond

It’s so strange that this is my first review of Old Forester 1897 Bottled in Bond. I’ve had this bottle for a while, and I thought I had reviewed it previously, but I guess I was wrong.&nb...Read More